In 1994, when I was 16, you never hear of a teenage girl
letting her boyfriend take nude photos or videos of her; she would’ve said “are
you crazy, someone might see them!” Today, cameras are so cheap and commonplace
that teens use them to post photos all over. It creates a kind of “delusion of
grandeur,” making the average teenager think she’s a media star. The problem
is, these teens have no idea how others see them, and they’re learning not to
safeguard their privacy.
The authors devote a lot of effort to drawing a fine line
between fact and sensational rumor; sex bracelets and rainbow parties are just
mass hysteria, and anyone who lived through the 1980’s will probably have wised
up to these things. Remember the satanic daycare abuse hysteria? What about the
Dungeons & Dragons killings? Perhaps you might remember getting the flyer
warning you about the temporary tattoos laced with LSD? We’re all wary of these
moral panic sensations, so the rainbow parties and sex bracelets we don’t worry
about as much. But sexting is real. It happens, and it’s a serious social
problem.
In the chapter “Controlling Teen Sexting” it discusses the
troubles with stopping kids from sexting each other. The problem is hard to
control, the laws regarding it are hard to enforce, and prosecutions can tie up
the court’s time. The schools in Kelso, Washington, have this approach; the
teachers can confiscate students’ phones, and if there are nude photos on it,
the parents are notified, and the student can be suspended or expelled.
However, this is not without criticism. Many argue that topless photos of girls
are not considered “nude,” because boys can be photographed topless without
accusation of lewdness. Do we make the law different for girls because they
have breasts? What if a girl has no breasts at all, do we consider topless
photos of her to be “nude” because of the way men look at it? And what if a boy
has gynecomastia, do we consider topless photos of him “nude” because he has
breasts? Wyoming County, Pennsylvania, had a similar problem, and the parents
sought help from the ACLU. They claimed that topless photos of their children were
not child pornography, and sued for invasion of privacy. According to their
lawyers, 12 year old girls in bras might or might not be lewd, but they were
not child porn. The case tied up the courts time.
The authors of this book stress education over regulation.
But this book came from NYU Press, and college professors and sociologists are
usually more liberal. Conservative like Sarah Palin aren’t interested in sex
education (I wonder if her daughter Bristol had any) but in abstinence
education. Sexting can be discouraged
among young people the same way smoking, drug use, unprotected sex and drunk
driving were discouraged. We need to face the fact that the internet is a
bigger influence on kids than parents, teachers, doctors, and religious
leaders. Get to the kids before the internet does.
I will conclude with a quote from right-wing economist Dr.
Thomas Sowell. He says “every generation is a barbarian invasion, we must
civilize them before they grow up.” He also says, and I stress this with regard
to people who aren’t taking charge, “when life comes down to the wimps versus
barbarians, the barbarians always win.”
No comments:
Post a Comment