The author begins his story in the late 80’s; a college
student with few job prospects in San Antonio, he drives east, then north. In
2000, he comes back, and it’s booming. Parker illustrates the story of Texas as
having internal as well as out-of-state migrations, both in the 80’s, when he
left, and present day, when people are moving in. Texas has always attracted
migrants, for cattle, oil, and agriculture. Even by the 1970’s, Texas had great
cities, like Dallas, which housed Fortune 500 companies. Yet even with the
wealthy cities, the state’s record on education, crime, health, and race
relations were lousy. He blames it in part on the migrations.
Parker writes that in the 1980’s, former rust belters came
to Texas, and strengthened the GOP’s position. Fast forward to 2015 however,
and the famous Republican hold on Texas is fading. The new Texans are young,
better educated, entrepreneurial, and often non-white, and they’re less
dependent on oil, cattle, and agriculture. There are fewer Fortune 500 jobs,
but lots of little ones. Not surprising, given that CD stores have closed, Blockbuster
is finished, Circuit City and Best Buy have downsized.
One change that the writer explores is how the state’s
attitude towards Gay Americans has changed. Houston, for instance, elected
Annise Parker as its mayor, and I guarantee that 20 years ago this would not
have happened. The first things she dealt with were typical city problems;
clearing ditches, unblocking sewers, and though she can’t take credit for the
building boom, nobody want to do business in a city that’s filthy. She even
proposed a law banning discrimination against gays and lesbians in the
workplace. Her following among women voters, gay voters, and minorities is
powerful.
Texas has always had a dependence on large-scale business,
like agriculture and oil, to sustain its economy. The problem was that the
these industries were somewhat anti-technology, and it’s not surprising, given
that solar and wind power would’ve cut into big oil’s market. The 2013 drought
hit the agricultural sector hard, and the farmers, certain that they were
fool-proof, had no water-savvy irrigation technology that the Israelis use.
Corn fields withered, cattle died, deer had to eat oleander leaves to survive
and it killed them off, and coyotes were so desperate that they started killing
and eating cats. Conservative Texans in the George Bush mold were not into
technology and innovation, and they ended up losing.
Parker is not, however, without his criticism of the new
Texas. In order not to raise taxes, Texas raised tuition rates for state and
local colleges (up to $50,000) which makes it harder for lower-income students,
often minorities. There are ways to alleviate the problem, however; tuition can
be lowered for majors that the state needs, like nursing, physical therapy,
early child education, and criminal justice.
I always imagined Texas the way I saw it on Dallas; a state full of gruff, loud,
conservative businessmen, dead set against any kind of change. The state’s
death row would be working overtime, executing multiple convicts daily, and the
schools, when not paddling the kids, would be checking to make sure nobody was
teaching evolution. The change, however, has arrived, not by force, but through
the “old guard” dying out.
Call it “intelligent design,” I suppose.