For those of you that saw The Great Gatsby and want to dress like Daisy Buchanan, you’re
right to think that people in the 1920’s were better dressed. But keep in mind
that the clothes of era were class-specific; everything was top-quality or
low-quality. You didn’t have plastic running shoes that wear out in three
months, nor cheap jeans and tee shirts from Kmart. Fabric dyes were costly, and
brightly-colored shirts were for those who could pay. Nowadays you buy a $10
shirt in garish colors, made cheaply in Asia, but you wouldn’t have had that in
the F. Scott Fitzgerald era. Brightly colored print fabric was costly at the
time. In fact, there were once laws restricting who could wear what. Check out Medici Money by Tim Parks, and you’ll
see how Renaissance Europe used clothes to maintain class barriers. Multicolored
clothing was worn only by the middle class, and only the wealthy were allowed
to wear furs!
Wearable Prints
tells the long and colorful story of the textile business, and how cloth makers
from Europe to the USA turned colors into a science. As I mentioned before,
brightly colored clothing was costly, but if you wanted a dress with patterns,
then you’d better come from money. Patterned fabric had to be embroidered by
hand, and skilled dressmakers didn’t come cheap. But soon the men in the
business found ways to put flowers on fabric by stamping them on. If you want
to say “well done gentlemen, you discovered something my kids did in
Kindergarten,” then you won’t be surprised at how crude some of the cloth
looked.
As time passed, fabrics would be less crude and have
beautiful designs. The Industrial Revolution brought heavy metal waste, and in
the process new colors were discovered. Metal oxides went from rusty reddish
brown to dark blue, light blue, yellow, and green, and soon affluent women wore
beautiful patterned dresses in cancer-causing colors. Dyers learned the
wax-resist methods from Asia, and found ways to “print” the wax resist onto
fabrics, then immersed them in dyes, giving them deep-blue cloth with white
flowers. But the more colors on the cloth, the more times it had to be painted
with wax and immersed in dye. That meant added cost, and since the rich are
going to want quality, these dyers knew they’d better do a great job!
Some of the costumes in this book were preserved from antiquity,
but a think a lot of them were reproduced from paintings. The evidence in Wearable Prints comes from fabric swatch
books that were preserved, so we have lots of samples from cloth from earlier
times. Paintings from our countries early days show what the people wore, but
thanks to the 160 year old fabric swatches, we can see how intricate the
clothes were. Whoever preserved these swatches has collected some great
historical sources.
Keep one thing in mind, however. Historical sources are usually
from portraits, and because they were costly, the subjects always wore their
best clothes. The images rarely detail what the people wore when they worked.
No comments:
Post a Comment