I often wondered how a parvenu like Princess Diana, a woman
with no education, could become such a beloved icon. I also wondered how Steve
Jobs, one 1/3 of the brain behind Apple Inc, could be seen as a genius rather
than a guru. The answer, according to Maxwell, is in the influence. He shows
how leadership is based on a combination of persona, talent, work, ambition,
and foresight. Many of our notions of leadership are, according to him, nothing
but myth, and he proceeds to shatter them.
Maxwell uses
real-life examples of famous leaders, like Teddy Roosevelt, who went from being
a sickly asthmatic child to all-American boxer, lawyer, naturalist, cowboy,
soldier, politician, etc. Then there’s Abraham Lincoln, who succeeded at first,
then failed miserably; he entered the Black Hawk War as a captain, screwed up,
and left the war as a private. Maxwell believes that Lincoln could have done
well as a captain, but he was not ready for the job. What he needed was to
start at the bottom, learn the needed skills, and work his way up. What the
author implies, though doesn’t state directly, is that Roosevelt’s education
won him the respect of the upper classes, while his ranching in the Dakotas won
him the respect of the lower classes. His muckraking against government corruption
was risky for a politician (and still is) but his reputation as a boxer made
people give him a wide berth. It brings to mind Vladimir Putin, with his
(staged) judo matches and riding his (drugged) bears, followed by riding his
horse shirtless in the cold. Yes, it’s likely that he grabs his coat as soon as
the photographers leave, but his manipulation of his image is what gets him
support.
The chapter that
resonates the most with me is The law of
Navigation, where the author uses the example of Robert F. Scott. The story
is tragic; Captain Scott took his men to reach the South Pole, a Norwegian beat
him to it, and Scott’s entire crew died on the way home. Now before I go any
further, let me warn you that I went to middle school in the UK, and we were
taught that Scott was a heroic explorer. The young and old believe that he was
a brave, upstanding adventurer, who remained a gentleman to the end, even as he
froze to death. But today, the gentleman navy officer, full of resolve while he
froze to death, is known as a bungler. He planned the wrong route, took the
wrong clothes, and used the wrong transportation. Not mentioned in the book is
that he dismissed the advice of his subordinate that the ponies were no good.
This is an issue that the author brings forth later, when he allows a church
member to lead, but only after making the needs of the church known. True
leaders are willing to listen, and they accept the expertise of others. It’s a
better strategy than saying “I’m in charge, just listen to me.”
John C. Maxwell doesn’t pull any punches
when discussing the skills and personality needed for leadership. He goes
through the many factors that can make or break a leader – character, skills,
work ethic, personality – and how famous leaders used them.
No comments:
Post a Comment