Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign

    When it came to dealing with the working classes, Hillary focused on the Flint water crisis, which meant she was doing two things wrong; focusing on only one community, and reminding everyone of how bad things were. Then, in a desperate bid to kick Sanders, she falsely accused him of voting no to the auto industry bailout. If her elbowing and grandstanding weren’t enough, she was now resorting to outright lying. Fact checkers went haywire on her, as Sanders had voted yes to the bailout. Nobody was happy with her now. Especially not the people who supported her.

    The authors argue that Hillary’s incredible myopia cost her the vote in the Rust Belt states, and that is where it mattered most. Winning over the White American working class voters would mean success or defeat, and she failed. It’s all in the chapter titled The Canary In the Auto Plant, which is perfectly apt, considering that old factory cities are the proverbial canary in the coal mine. The state of Michigan is full of working-class White voters, and whatever she’d do – or not do – would resonate all over the USA. Her failure to win the Rust Belt is what resonated. The working classes felt like she was demonizing them.

    This book stresses Hillary’s complete and utter failure to connect with the White voters who had no college education. Be it Michigan, Ohio, New Hampshire, or Missouri, she ended up alienating everyone. The authors Allen and Parnes suggest that her six-figure speaking fees may have been part of the problem along with her chummy relationship with Wall Street tycoons. It made her look like a pawn of big business, and though Wall Street tycoons are powerful, they are few in number. Though Irish and Polish-American auto workers are probably not going to be seen at an a “ban Wall Street” rally, they’re not going to have much use for a dinner party full of CEO’s. The laid-off workers would probably have liked for her to meet with them and show some concern for THEIR needs, not just those of the 1%. All she needed was to win over one UAW chapter, and she’d have won over all of them. Though not expressly mentioned in the book, a lot of Hillary’s campaign cash was raised by her husband Bill, who shamelessly profits off his status as an ex-president.

    The authors don’t talk about Trump much, after all he’s not the subject of the book. But they do stress that he concentrated on the electoral vote by winning over entire states, particularly in the Rust Belt. After that, he went for that states where Obama had won in 2008. His tough-talking bravado impressed a lot of people there, and it swung the vote in his favor. There’s also a possibility that older Black voters may have voted for Trump; those that are fed up with crime and disorder may have been looking for a president who’d get tough.


    I always had the vibe that Hillary Clinton was elbowing her way into the spotlight, and this book confirms it. She comes across here as I always saw her; a ranting, domineering tyrant, and according to this book, nobody was fooled. Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, had a strong following among working class whites, which Hillary did not. In fact, it seems like she was deliberately avoiding them. Not smart.

No comments:

Post a Comment