Wednesday, October 2, 2013

The Amish by Kraybill, Johnson Weiner, and Nolt


In 2006, a crazed gunman took an Amish school hostage, killed the kids, then killed himself. Immediately afterward, the victims’ families called on the killer’s family, offering support. One might ask how they could be so forgiving, and the answer is that they were taught all their lives to forgive and move on. They learn, by their elders’ example, not to show anger or hold grudges. It’s one of the habits that are essential to their survival.

   The point of The Amish is that tradition is the core of their perseverance and success. Before we go further, please don’t think that “tradition” is what you see in Fiddler On the Roof. On the contrary, the opening song Tradition from that musical is really making fun of tradition. Amish traditions are designed to keep everyone productive and make sure that they all get along.

    I went straight to the chapter Gender and Family because it’s exactly what every non-Amish wants to know about. I wanted to know if their gender roles are rigid, if the men control the women, how the families interact, etc. The answer I got from reading this great book is as follows; while the “work” roles are separated, the “social” ones are not. Girls are taught domestic work, while boys are taught farm skills and craftsmanship, but if there are no girls around, boys will do the dished, and vice versa.  Socially, things aren’t taught as they are with skills. Boys will be given dolls to play with, and girls will be given toy trucks (the parents don’t care) and the genders play together without restriction. It’s also possible, though not mentioned in the book, that the kids are not influenced by stereotypes. Take the average children’s book featuring animal characters; the father has a newspaper and a pipe, the mother does the cooking, little sister wears a pink dress, and the brother wears sneaker and has a scooter. It’s the same thing in cartoons and kiddie shows, but without a TV, and a limited number of non-Amish books, the kids won’t see it. Go into the average liberal household, and you’ll see parents discouraging thee year old boys from playing with dolls. But with the Amish, they don’t care. Genders are separated at times, but never segregated.

    Like the Native Americans, Amish women recuse themselves from preparing food during “that time of the month,” so obviously, the men will have to pitch in for those days that the wives are out. Assigning heavy chores to boys makes sense, because the men have greater upper-body strength. By assigning girls to learn cooking, it free the men to do heavy labor. But that doesn’t mean that the men snap their fingers when they want things; both genders have to respect each other. I was reminded of the book Rolling Thunder (about the Medicine Man of the same name) who argued with some feminists about “sexist” gender roles. The feminists argued that assigning women to do cooking was chauvinistic, but Rolling Thunder argued “where you come from, are you allowed three days vacation every time you menstruate?” The feminists replied “that means she can’t see her children for three days!” What can you do? Everyone’s entitled to their ways.

   Transgressions-like unmarried pregnancy or adultery-are punished by “shunning,” which is a form of temporary excommunication. To the Amish, this is not a punishment, but a way to avoid bad influences. Native Americans are known to do this if a member of their tribe violates their rules; in Looking For Lost Bird, a Navajo family is ordered to leave the reservation, because their 13 year old son is punching female students on the bus. Like the Amish, the Navajo used to have a tradition of having boys and girls work apart from each other, but thanks to modern life, they were thrown together. Some families can’t reconcile this with modern gender-mixing, and you get trouble. Even in modern families, shunning can be used, as it is in the New York Times article Angela Whitaker’s Climb (compiled in Class Matters.) In the story, the mother won’t let her grown children near their siblings out of fear that they’ll be a bad influence, and her method works. Keeping the kids away from trouble is a major part of Amish child-rearing, but only in an Amish community could this work. In Amish life, you don’t have unemployment; the kids are working in some way from the time they can hold a spoon, so they’re never left without something to do. On the opposite side, you have single parent families in towns with no jobs. What will the kids do with their time?

    My only fault with this book is the lack of first-person accounts. The chapter on Rumspringa shows that the media portrayals and the documentary were greatly exaggerated and sensationalized, so I would prefer to hear what the individuals have to say. I’ve also read that the Amish were not happy about the movie Witness, where Harrison Ford defends his Amish hosts with his fists. Their spokesman was quoted as “our tradition bars us from filing a lawsuit to keep this movie out of the theatres.” I would also have like to hear about Edward Gingrich, the only Amish man ever convicted of murder.

  Overall, The Amish is a great book. It’s a tie-in with the American Experience documentary, though it will take considerably longer to read this huge volume than watch the program. The book’s thoroughness is praiseworthy, along with its unbiased approach. It doesn’t overpraise the Amish, nor does it criticize their ways. If you’re wondering how traditional societies cope with the modern era, this book is perfect.

No comments:

Post a Comment